This article covers the recent case in the Court of Appeal about the use of blanket injunctions to ban travellers from stopping on local authority owned land.

This is always a busy time of year for traveller movement, and the pandemic has not changed that. This leaves landowners with the decision as to what to do when they have traveller incursions on illegal encampments.

The majority of possession claims will start in the county court, rather than the High Court. However, there are some specific circumstances where the case may start there.

When evicting occupiers from a site, the one virtual certainty is that there will be resistance in some form or another, which will frequently be accompanied by hazards.

When you need to remove trespassers from a site, whether they be travellers, protesters or squatters, a risk assessment is essential before starting the operation.

Protests can be highly emotionally charged, with occupants determined to make a stand and take dramatic steps to resist removal. So, how do we protect your reputation during an eviction?

Abandoned and construction sites are seeing a significant rise in trespassers prepared to risk their own lives to partake in stunts and thrill-seeking activities.

The CPO warrant is the instruction to the HCEO to deliver possession of the land to the acquiring authority. No other court order is required.

When you have travellers on your land, you’ll need to consider the following: Children, Animals, Human rights etc.

During the recent National Eviction Team webinar, there were a number of questions asked. Here we bring you the answers.

It is quite common for hazardous materials to be present on site during an eviction. There may be a number of reasons for this:

When removing trespassers the authorised High Court Enforcement Officer (HCEO) will have nine key steps at the forefront of their minds to undertake.